Talk:Juggernaut
From Command and Conquer Wiki
Do juggernauts overrun vehicles? They're are too slow to catch up with the things i want them to step on so far.
Answered my own question, crushed some Nod harvesters in skirmish in hold fire mode.
They don't outrun many vehicles if thats whats ur saying. They either have to be rushing at a juggernaut thats moving or staying still when the juggernaut squishes it.
The Juggernauts rival Advanced Artillery, Beam cannons and Specters with three super mega heavy artillery bombardment cannons unlike Specters single cannon.(Assaulthead 21:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC))
- No. Neither super, nor mega. Shaur M. S. Grizlin 21:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Seriously, lets get this over with when it comes with strong artillery. Just say that three is better than one cannon for bombardment plus Juggernauts are bigger and have more armor than the Specter.(Assaulthead 00:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC))
- No. A single cannon is easier to maintain, upkeep, provide ammunition for and oh, look, a Juggernaut stands over ten meters tall and is eqsily distinguishable and destroyed on the battlefield. Plus, compare the sizes of the cannons. Specter has a bigger cannon and is stealthed. He's a pure artillery vehicle while the Juggernaut is an unholy union of a cruiser and a walker. Shaur M. S. Grizlin 07:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Seriously, lets get this over with when it comes with strong artillery. Just say that three is better than one cannon for bombardment plus Juggernauts are bigger and have more armor than the Specter.(Assaulthead 00:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC))
By the way the Juggernauts can be upgraded in the M3A variant which is rival to Specters on versatility and it looks more badder than ever. Plus 3 Railguns are powerful on most targets and rival even the Specter and Devastator Warships.(Assaulthead 03:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC))
Is the Behemoth the sucessor to the Mk. III Juggernaut or is it the other way around? 67.161.46.197 03:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)